These are
sample SAT prompts. I wandered upon them
today when I was looking for something to spur my writing. Conveniently, for your sake, I have put my
answer below each question.
Do we
benefit from learning about the flaws of people we admire and respect?
Maybe.
Is it best for people to accept who they are and what they have,
or should people always strive to better themselves?
Both, it’s
not a duality.
Can common
sense be trusted and accepted, or should it be questioned?
Both, it
depends.
Can
knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?
Sure, it
can be both.
Is
conscience a more powerful motivator than money, fame, or power?
Maybe, it
depends on the person.
Do we need
other people in order to understand ourselves?
I think
so, but I also long for a silent retreat in the southwest.
Can
success be disastrous?
Two words:
Lindsey Lohan.
Is the
world changing for the better?
In some
ways.
Is there
always another explanation or another point of view?
More than
likely.
Is
deception ever justified?
Sure, but
it depends on what the person is being deceptive about.
Should heroes be defined as people who say what they think when
we ourselves
lack the
courage to say it?
If you
want to define heroes that way.
Do you think that we need adversity to help us discover who we
are?
Yes, at least in my case.
When I think about who I was at seventeen taking the SAT, I knew nothing about the flaws of the people I admired. Nor the potential burden of knowledge or what
may or may not define heroism. I had
been deceptive, but had no gist of its toxins. I barely knew myself and had not
had enough intimate or intense exchanges with people to see if and how they
might influence me. Adversity? What did
I know of adversity? That comes after
late night calls, slippery roads in the winter, emergency surgery. Your boss, skunking around, asking if you
could come into her office.
It strikes me as so irrational that a gaggle of high school juniors
would be locked in a room for hours and asked to answer these really sophisticated
and ambiguous questions.
I bet, back then in 1978, I just took a stance -- yes or no --
and set up a five paragraph essay (topic, three supports, closing) to
demonstrate my writing ability. I’m sure I made an effort to use some degree of
mature language and transitional phrasing.
Thus, we can only conclude the
myriad affects of success on the lengthy lfespan of an individual.
Yada, yada. Puke.
At seventeen, you should be asked one question: Who are you and
how did you get to be you?
Or maybe: who do you love and why? Perhaps: What was the most influential event of your life to
this point? Explain.
But weighing and measuring questions that take a lifetime to
truly consider? These questions? They are for us. Us, gathered around a night fire. Hunkered down in a coffee shop. Circling an airport four thousand feet in the air next to a stranger. These are late night, in-the-dark questions.
These are table-slapping salon questions.
These questions need some of the meat and gristle of living. They need
the pitter and the pat of one person speaking with another. The pausing, the rethinking, the sharing of
story. And the beautiful truth of “I’m
not sure” hanging sweetly on the vine.
No comments:
Post a Comment